Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/bitstream/2149/360/1/GettingtheMixRightAgain.pdf

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A. & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289.

Caliskan, H. (2009). Facilitators' perception of interactions in an online learning program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 193-203.

Chang, S.- H. H. & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.

Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A. & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.

DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A. & Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6), 920-940.

Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K. & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207-226.

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y. & Park, s. Y. (2011). Investigating the structural relationships among organisational support, learning flow, learners' satisfaction and learning transfer in corporate e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 973-984.

Kim, K.-J., Bonk, C. J. & Teng, Y.-T. (2009). The present state and future trends of blended learning in workplace learning settings across five countries. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 299-308.

Kirkpatrick, D. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training and Development Journal, 33(6), 78-92.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Expanding the Interaction Equivalency Theorem Padilla Rodriguez and Armellini

Kirkpatrick, J. D. & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2010). Training on trial: How workplace learning must reinvent itself to remain relevant. New York, USA: AMACOM.

Korhonen, T. & Lammintakanen, J. (2005). Web-based learning in professional development: Experiences of Finnish nurse managers. Journal of Nursing Management, 13, 500-507.

Lee, Y. & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593 618.

Macpherson, A., Elliot, M., Harris, I. & Homan, G. (2004). E-learning: reflections and evaluation of corporate programmes. Human Resource Development International, 7(3), 295-313.

Padilla Rodriguez, B. C. & Armellini, A. (2013a). Interaction and effectiveness of corporate e learning programmes. Human Resource Development International, 16(4), 1-10.

Padilla Rodriguez, B. C. & Armellini, A. (2013b). Student engagement with a content-based learning design. Research in Learning Technology, 21(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22106

Padilla Rodriguez, B. C. & Armellini, A. (2014). Applying the interaction equivalency theorem to online courses in a large organisation. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(2), 51 66.

Padilla Rodriguez, B. C. & Fernandez Cardenas, J. M. (2012).Developing professional competence at a Mexican organization: Legitimate peripheral participation and the role of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(2012), 8-13.

Peak, D. & Berge, Z. L. (2006). Evaluation and eLearning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 124-131.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, resence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21 40.

Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/603/1178

Russell, M., Kleiman, G., Carey, R. & Douglas, J. (2009). Comparing self-paced and cohort-based online courses for teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 443 466. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Expanding the Interaction Equivalency Theorem Padilla Rodriguez and Armellini

Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: the key to active online learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.

Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: the key to online teaching and learning. New York, USA: Routledge.

Skillsoft. (2004). EMEA e-learning benchmark survey: The users' perspective. Retrieved from http://www.oktopusz.hu/domain9/files/modules/module15/365BAEFCF22C27D.pdf

Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X. & Lee, S. (2005). The importance of interaction in web based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1-19.

Tomkin, J. H., & Charlevoix, D. (2014). Do professors matter?: Using an a/b test to evaluate the impact of instructor involvement on MOOC student outcomes. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2566245

Vaughan, K. & MacVicar, A. (2004). Employees' pre-implementation attitudes and perceptions to e-learning: A banking case study analysis. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(5), 400-413.

Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G. & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258.

Young, K. A. (2005). Direct from the source: The value of ‘think-aloud' data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 6(1), 19-33.

Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 152-165.

© Padilla Rodriguez and Armellini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.